Understanding Lochner: Testing Three Rival Theoretical Perspectives

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Understanding Lochner: Testing Three Rival Theoretical Perspectives

Show full item record

Title: Understanding Lochner: Testing Three Rival Theoretical Perspectives
Author(s):
Childress, Curt Alan
Advisor: Champagne, Anthony M
Date Created: 2017-05
Format: Dissertation
Keywords: Show Keywords
Abstract: The Lochner v. New York case initiated a great debate among judicial scholars. Conventional wisdom surrounding Lochner is that Justice Holmes’ dissent exposed unwarranted judicial activism by the majority, while some scholars recently have been slowly re-assessing Justice Peckham’s majority opinion to determine the extent that the opinion rests as a product of the historical era. Rival explanations for Substantive Due Process jurisprudence during the Lochner era were examined and tested by reviewing lower federal court and state court decisions. The theories reviewed were a) the court guarding economic liberty, b) the court guarding against factionalism in government, and c) the court as an agent of business. My findings found that the best perspective for explaining the Lochner era was the court system’s commitment to protecting economic liberties against government encroachment. The evidence rejects Holmes’ agent of business perspective as presented in his dissent.
Degree Name: PHD
Degree Level: Doctoral
Persistent Link: http://hdl.handle.net/10735.1/5443
Type : text
Degree Program: Political Science

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
CHILDRESS-DISSERTATION-2017.pdf 627.1Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)


Show full item record